I asked my friend, Crystal Lutton to write this post for me. Crystal is a rabbi and pastor at the Shema Congregation, and is a Messianic Jew. She is also a published author, wife, and mother.
Yes, God commands circumcision.
Is Circumcision the "Christian" thing to do? by Crystal Lutton
Yes, God commands circumcision.
Deuteronomy 10:16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no longer stubborn.
Deuteronomy 30:6 And the LORD your God will circumcise
your heart and the heart of your offspring, so that you will love the
LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may
live.
Except the debate that goes on around us in the modern world is about circumcising the flesh.
What
is the big deal about circumcision? It happens to be one of those
issues that gets debated on mommy blogs, has entire websites devoted to
doing it and not doing it, has spawned movements, and has resulted in
the threat of divorce from those who support it and are opposed to it.
But what’s the big deal? Is there really anything to be fighting about?
I’ll
leave the issue of Routine Infant Circ (RIC) to others - except to say
that some doctors refuse to perform RIC and I have yet to encounter any
compelling information supporting RIC. At this point the largest reason I
hear for people circing their sons is to have them look like daddy -
which I would like to point out would utterly change in one generation
if this generation would say no - the next generation would be avoiding
circ so that Junior could look like his father. I do want to be very
clear, however, that RIC does not fulfill any aspect of the Biblical
circ and should you convert to Judaism you would still need to be
pricked to shed blood.
Which
leads me to what I do want to discuss --- what the Bible actually says
about circumcision and whether Christians need to do it.
According
to Genesis 17:24 Abraham was 90 years old when he was circumcised. And
Romans 4:12 points out that it he is the father of our faith - a faith
he had before he was circumcised. It was in Genesis 17 that God had a
heart to heart with Abraham and said this (vs 10):
“This
is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant
you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised”
He
goes on to say that this circumcision is to be done on the 8th day and
includes those born to him and his descendants, those bought from a
foreigner or in their home as indentured servants. Born by blood or
bought with your money, if they are living in your home the males must
be circumcised. Verse 14 gives insight into how serious an issue this
was to be:
“Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."
We
see this being very important when we get to the Exodus and we are told
that no one is allowed to eat the Passover Lamb who has not been
circumcised. This is because only those who have truly converted to
Judaism are going to be allowed to be in the homes protected by the
Passover Lamb’s blood, and only those who have truly joined up with the
Jewish people are going to be allowed to join them in the Exodus and be
with them when they are made a Nation.
Circumcision
was introduced as an outward sign that you were going to eventually
possess a circumcised heart and become part of God’s Kingdom. If you
were not circumcised before joining God’s Kingdom, that circumcision of
the flesh was the external sign that you were now sporting a circumcised
heart. It was the last step of conversion to Judaism. Without it you
were a God-fearer, with it you were a convert with full rights and
status. But I don’t want to make it sound like things are all cut and
dried (no pun intended). There was discussion between God and Abraham
over whether circumcision was needed (and Abraham was allowed to go from
age 48 when he responded to God’s promise of a covenant until he was 90
and was circumcised), and between different Jewish sects over what is
required of the proselyte.
What
exactly is this circumcision? What does it mean? You might recognize
the root for “circle” - also seen in circumference, or the measure of
the distance around a circle. There is also the root for “cut” - also
seen in incision. So we have a command to cut a circle. And we know
from study of this issue and especially from Zipporah’s faithfulness
with Moses’ son, that the circle was cut in the foreskin.
What
was actually commanded was to cut the tip of the foreskin off. The
foreskin is a large piece of skin that hangs down over the head of the
penis anywhere from a short distance to quite a large amount. The
average RIC removes approximately a postcard size piece of skin. But the
command wasn’t to remove the foreskin - it was to cut a circle in the
foreskin - or remove the tip. In fact, the practice was to remove the
tip of the foreskin until around the time of Paul and the Romans.
Paul
speaks of removing the marks of circumcision, and “uncircing” is a
practice to this day involving hanging weights from the foreskin to try
and lengthen it and recreate the covering of an uncirc’d penis. At the
point he was teaching it was a big deal to be circumcised if you wanted
to go to the gymnasium or the bathhouses because the Romans viewed
circumcision as mutilation. It was not uncommon for Jewish men to try
and lengthen their foreskin or hide the marks of their circumcision.
The response of the Rabbinic community was to alter the style of
circumcision and remove more foreskin - making it harder to fit in
outside of the Jewish community.
Paul’s
response to the issue is quite different. He says, “Was anyone at the
time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the
marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised?
Let him not seek circumcision.” This is because Paul was navigating
something amazing and new that God was doing - God was welcoming the
former Gentiles into His Kingdom!
Paul
was navigating the coming together of different classes, different
races, different people of different backgrounds as they all responded
to the promises of salvation through Jesus. Those who came Jewish were
told to stay Jewish. Those who came as non-Jews were told to not get
circumcised - God had accepted them as non-Jews and it was okay to
remain non-Jews.
The
Jerusalem Council agreed with him! Peter had already had his vision
where God made it clear to him that the Gospel was going to the Nations -
the non-Jews. The non-Jews who accepted Jesus were being called clean
by God! The Jerusalem Council did not require circumcision for those
who were becoming part of this new and expanding community.
And yet we continue to debate this in 2013!
I
understand those who are born Jewish and want to know whether
circumcision is still required for their children. It is an ancient
tradition and there is something amazing about being part of a tradition
commanded by God for those who are born as descendants of Abraham.
There is debate within the Jewish community about the modern practice of
circumcision and there are ceremonies that can be found online for
blessing ceremonies that don’t cut the flesh. For those who want to
undergo brit milah and have a Biblical circumcision, I recommend talking
to a mohel about the actual practice. To this day there are three
types of circumcision which each remove a different amount of skin.
Talk about removing the least skin possible. There was even a Rabbinic
allowance for those babies who might have bleeding disorders. They were
allowed to have only one prick of the skin because a single drop of
blood was considered enough to have cut the covenant. As with all
things I advocate doing your research and determining exactly what you
want done to your son.
I
understand those who have embraced a Messianic approach to worship
where, regardless of your nation of birth, you have embraced a Torah
observant lifestyle. While Paul and the Jerusalem Council were
insistent that you need not be circumcised to be part of the Kingdom
People, there is a place for discussing whether, now that you are part
of the Kingdom People, this command to circumcise your males on the 8th
day applies to you. This is something that you must work out between
you and the Lord and please do not let anyone try to dictate what you
will do with your sons. If you do determine to have them undergo brit
milah, please see my encouragement above to speak to a mohel and pursue a
ceremony involving the least removal of foreskin. I do not believe
that God ever intended men to lose their foreskin completely, even where
shed blood was supposed to mark their inclusion in a covenant people.
I
do not understand the debate among those who do not embrace living
according to Torah and who are not blood descendants of Abraham. There
is absolutely no command for the Nations to be circumcised. A RIC does
not satisfy the requirements of Biblical circumcision.
*For more information about the history of circumcision you can read here http://www.aboutcirc.com/tradit.htm
Hi, this is to "anonymous" who submitted two comments for this post. You challenged me to post your comments, and I would love to post comments. However, how they came through was broken up between two different submissions, and I'm not sure what they say. I would love to hear your thoughts, if you'd still like to share. Feel free to email me, calee824@yahoo.com.
ReplyDeleteA small but growing number of (non-Messianic) Jews are turning to Brit Shalom, non-surgical naming ceremonies for boys. There are now well over 100 celebrants, a majority of them rabbis, in 34 US states, and several other countries, contactable through this link: http://tinyurl.com/britshalom
ReplyDelete